Showing posts with label UAAP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UAAP. Show all posts
Saturday, 7 March 2015

The twice-to-beat advantage of De La Salle University was nullified last Wednesday when NU beat them in straight sets to force a do-or-die match today. Stats for the previous match below:

It's clear from the numbers above what made the difference -
NU's dominance in all offensive stops (including kill blocks) overwhelmed La
Salle's defense. La Salle's digging is their main pitfall -
although they have out-dug the Lady Bulldogs in excellent digs per set and dig
conversion (these two metrics mainly measure how many of their successful
attacks came from successful digs), their dig rate% is at a
dismal 63%, far from their season average of 76.8%.
This means that they were able to dig NU's attacks only 63% of the
time - their digs and dives are not enough to keep the ball alive
during rallies, which bumps up NU's attacking %. Furthermore, La
Salle's offense mainly comes from in-system plays (exc sets 9.33 vs
NU's 6.67, first ball offense% 28% vs NU's 21%),
but they are unable to capitalize on this because NU gets points even
from non-excellent plays - a testament to their attacking prowess.
Remember that volleyball uses a rally point system - any point is gold,
whether it be coming from in-system plays or not. What La Salle needs to do
this afternoon is to hustle - they need to produce points from
all corners, and keep in mind that mid-game adjustments to an offensive
system is needed, especially facing NU's rejuvenated team (with momentum on
their side as well).
Keys to the Match - De La Salle University
- Offense should have more power so
as to startle the opponent and force them to commit errors. In
their previous matches, La Salle was able to win because they force their
opponents to commit more errors than them.
- However, they shouldn't just be
dependent upon NU's errors for their points. More importantly, they should
be efficient in attacking as much as possible. In the
previous game, La Salle was down to an attack efficiency of only 13%,
very far from their season average of 22.1% - they can't
depend solely on excellent sets, they need to get points from any
opportunity possible.
Keys to the Match - National University
- Continue receiving
opponent's serve well so as to set up attacks without
distractions
- NU's biggest improvement in the
semis is their ability to efficiently play the ball by not
committing errors. In the previous game, their error weight (error to
point contribution) is down to just 25%, while their season
average was at 46.0% . This is crucial especially when trying to side-out
on tied scores.
Prediction: NU with momentum on their side, if
they get more point contributions from attacks than La Salle. However, knowing
La Salle's recovery, NU's momentum can be a non-factor.

The first match of the finals series was a doozy for
Ateneo de Manila fans as they were able to win it in 4 sets versus the
defending champions National University. Stats summary for the first match
below:

As you can see above, Ateneo has dominated the game in
almost all skills. Biggest advantages for Ateneo are their attacks and passes: AttackEff%
for Ateneo at 29%, even higher than their eliminations average of 27%,
and their passing% at 89%. Although Ateneo commits more service
errors per set (4.25 vs 2.00), their seemingly inconsistent (i.e. error prone)
service shouldn't be taken lightly: the fact that they have more aces per set
means that they are being aggressive on the serve - Ateneo's main strategy
is to take control of the rally via strong serves so that
the opponent cannot set up good plays for their attackers, which is why NU's
passing% is only at 77%, and can also explain why they have fewer excellent
sets (12.75 vs Ateneo's 14.25) and therefore attacks (49 atks vs Ateneo's 64). NU's
offense suffered because their floor defense cannot hold, and they should
address it this game. For Ateneo, they just need to keep doing what they've
been doing in the first game, but be wary of relaxing as they will be facing of
a more compelled NU team.
Keys to
the Match - National University
- Passing efficiency shouldn't be
below 30% - it is imperative that they must receive the
ball better, not just to avoid giving opponent service aces, but for their
own benefit as well to gain back momentum as well as
better chances of getting a side out. In the elimination rounds, their
average passeff% for won games was 30.2%, and 25.3% for lost games.
- Point contribution of the team
from atks, blks and aces should be at least 70% of total
points won - in other words, they need to be able to take control
of the game. In the game 1 of the finals, their point contribution was
only at 62.8%, which means 37.2% of their won points came
from opponent errors, which is a fatal mistake to make in volleyball - you
cannot just rely on opponent errors to win a game.
Keys to
the Match - Ateneo de Manila University
- Continue to be aggressive
on the serve. Despite committing more errors, they won the games where
the team took more risk on the service line.
- Floor defense
should persist throughout the match, so that they could set up their
attacks well.
Prediction: Ateneo, if NU cannot make the necessary adjustments in
their floor defense.
Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Another season, another stepladder series in the Women's Division. This year, however, the 4th spot is tied between 2 teams, and so a playoff is needed before a knockout match vs NU will be completed. Then the winner will be facing twice-to-beat La Salle, then the defending champions Ateneo who is thrice-to beat. First off, let's check out how the UST-FEU playoff match will take place.

Offense
|
Offense
|
UST
|
FEU
|
|
|
Spike
|
5
|
4
|
FEU
|
|
Atk Eff%
|
15%
|
16%
|
|
|
1stBall Off%
|
13%
|
11%
|
|
|
Serve
|
5
|
3
|
FEU
|
|
Ace per set
|
1.28
|
1.57
|
|
|
Fault/set
|
2.12
|
1.64
|
|
|
% Good Srv
|
90%
|
93%
|
|
|
Srv Eff %
|
-4%
|
0%
|
|
|
Set
|
3
|
6
|
UST
|
|
Exc Set /set
|
7.80
|
6.02
|
|
|
Off Eff %
|
72%
|
54%
|
|
FEU is currently in the
the top 4 of both ranks in attacking and serving, registering an attack
efficiency of 16% as well as a high good serve % of 93% (they commit service
errors only 7% of the time). UST however has better setting, being the third
best in the league, with 72% of their successful attacks coming off excellent
plays from Alex Cabanos. Note that excellent plays are only good if
the team is able to convert them, therefore UST's offense should not just be
based attacks from plays but on all other possible avenues as well, such as
service aces, which FEU is currently third best in the league. If FEU can keep
up their attacking % as well as be aggressive on the serve, this will be for
their benefit.
Defense
|
Defense
|
UST
|
FEU
|
|
|
Block
|
2
|
5
|
UST
|
|
Rebound %
|
33%
|
31%
|
|
|
Dig
|
3
|
5
|
UST
|
|
Digs per set
|
8.60
|
8.26
|
|
|
Dig Conv
|
23%
|
22%
|
|
|
Dig Rate %
|
83%
|
83%
|
|
|
Pass
|
5
|
6
|
UST
|
|
Pass Eff%
|
16%
|
13%
|
|
|
Adj Pass Eff%
|
84%
|
86%
|
|
|
Passing %
|
84%
|
85%
|
|
UST's main gun other than
their playmaking will be their defense. On all defensive skills, they are on
top of FEU, especially in blocking, where they are currently 2nd best in the
league (behind La Salle). If they can improve on their passing skills this game
(passing% very close to FEU), UST can handle FEU's serves, which will also let
them set-up better plays for their attackers. FEU's very dismal defense is due
to it mainly being handled by one person, star libero Tin Agno -
FEU's other backrow players need to help and dig/receive the ball well enough
for them to keep the play alive.
Keys to the match:
UST
- Take advantage of their biggest
edge over FEU which is blocking.
- Hustle on attacks and try to score the same
amount as the opponent if not more. They need to be able to get points not
just from blocks but on attacks as well.
|
UST
|
WON
|
LOST
|
AVE
|
|
PT DIFF/SET
|
4.08
|
-2.40
|
2.21
|
|
FROM
OWN EFFORTS |
4.57
|
-1.93
|
2.69
|
|
FROM ERRS
|
-0.49
|
-0.47
|
-0.48
|
FEU
- Service game should start strong, so that the opponent will have a
harder time setting up better plays for their attackers.
- Be aggressive on all skills. FEU lost
games in the eliminations due to their opponents' efforts in atks, blks
and aces overwhelming FEU's own contributions. They should be able to
score more on all offensive options as much as possible.
|
FEU
|
WON
|
LOST
|
AVE
|
|
PT DIFF/SET
|
0.88
|
-3.32
|
-1.89
|
|
FROM
OWN EFFORTS |
1.63
|
-4.16
|
-2.19
|
|
FROM ERRS
|
-0.75
|
0.84
|
0.30
|
Prediction: UST if
they can overcome FEU's attacks with their own and be steady in their defense,
both floor and net. Momentum is on the side of FEU however.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Search
Upcoming Games
Categories
Adamson
AFC
Ateneo
AVC
AVC Srs
BEL
BGVC
BRA
CAN
CHN
Cignal
Cocolife
CWC
DOM
Eczacibasi
F2-Logistics
FEU
FIVB
Foton
FRA
Fundamentals
Generika
Hisamitsu
ITA
JPN
La Salle
NED
NU
Petron
Philippines
Pomi
PSL
Rexona
RUS
SRB
Sta. Lucia
THA
TUR
U23
UAAP
Uncategorized
UP
USA
UST
Vakifbank
Volero
WGP
World League
Follow us on Twitter!
Copyright 2016 VolleyMetricsPH. Powered by Blogger.